Philosophy, Politics, Opinion, Art, and Food for Thought... A matter of record, conscience, and consciousness.
Saturday, November 9, 2024
Democrat Big Tent Dissembly
There is a simple solution: Set up a Grand Party exosketon that the coalition agrees to assemble, form quarum, and vote to nominate their National Presidential Candidate. Beyond that local Measures will come into being as primary priorities, because at the end of the day operating government is a responsibilty we can't have people take lightly and must start locally.
Here are nine simple categories to create along simple Social Liberal to Conservative, and Fiscal Liberal to Conservative lines that can all simultaneously pursue their goals and objectives at a local and states level, while voting mostly under the Democratic Big Tent. I would like to suggest that each Working Party fashions environmental policy at the local level, but also everyone in these parties hopefully accepts Climate Change as a True fact that should be a part of all Democratic Grand Party Budget Proposals.
Of course there would be the opportunity to have simple one issue coalitions, the proposal here is for these to be autonomous parties that sign a pledge to vote for the Democratic National Candidates, but do their own thing at the states level:
Democratic Republican: Social and Fiscal Conservative;
These would be people who occasionally vote with Republicans
Democratic Centrist: Social Conservative and Fiscal Centrist
These would be people who occasionally vote with Republicans on Social Issues, but believe in some Government Safety net.
Democratic Socialist: Social Conservative and Fiscal Liberal
These would be people who believe in affording a big safety net with balanced budgets.
Conservative Democratic: Social Centrist and Fiscal Conservative
These people would look to afford safety net programs within some austerity.
Democrat: Social and Fiscal Centrist
This would be the party that would take all the information from the other eight and determine a median policy in both fiscal and social matters.
Centrist Democratic: Social Centrist and Fiscal Liberal
This would be the party of people who believe spending on social saftey net programs is something we need to afford.
Democratic Libertarian: Social Liberal and Fiscal Conservative
This would be a party faction that would caucus with Libertarians, but also believe in rules and regulations to achieve free market ideals.
Social Democrat: Social Liberal and Fiscal Centrist
This would be a group who believe in affording social programs, but also expect debt and negative spending is an option to support social programs.
Liberal: Social and Fiscal Liberal
Believe that social programs are primary priority regardless of financial outcomes.
Tuesday, May 31, 2022
National Guns License
To accord with the Second Amendment, each state could issue gun licenses. Except, transportation of firearms across state boundaries, ought to require a National Firearms license.
Like a car: title, license, registration and insurance would be required of the user. Dealers and manufacturers assure quality, and Dealers must use professional discretion following, so called, red flag laws.
We know how to do this. The States could use the national guidance for State Licenses and registration.
A written safety exam, required safety demonstation, and age minimums would be contingent. Additionally, mental health wellness, compitency, and background checks are required.
Any modification, such as required Corrective lenses, permits to carry in public and concealed all would be on gun owner's license to quickly deter foolish, irrational, and mentally ill ownership.
Each gun has a registration already, but it would require each gun to have Title and registration, being operated by licensee. Three parts of liability, so that insurance companies can give liability insurance for torturous constraints, lest we determine the tort settlements per victim.
We already have the infrastructure for all intents and purposes, now let's please do something already!
Friday, August 14, 2020
Forget Beer, It's Time for a Fender Bender
Presidential Elections are the most famous popularity contests in the world.
Famously, we like to think we are voting for an Angel, rather than settling for a Devil by the thought exercise, “which candidate would you rather have a beer with?” (Yes, like a good American grammarian I ended the survey question a preposition with.)
Except, we are in extraordinary circumstances:
Hundred Year Pandemic
Chronic Systemic Deferred Maintenance
Climate Change Proven beyond a Doubt
Reconciliation of Civil Rights a precipitous necessity
Worst Economic statistics since measurements began from The Great Depression
You can see how people might be willing to choose the best devil in such terrible circumstances, rather than the nicest angel. Whose Executive Administration will be able to handle the massive macroeconomic issues?
Almost makes you not even care if you even like the person, so long as you think they may help?
So, which Candidate would you rather get into a low speed fender bender with?
Thought Exercise
You are driving your crap auto called US, and the timing belt needs adjustment, tires are worn, and the brakes have been squealing for months, but like most Americans you don’t have an extra $400 to fix them.
As you approach an intersection at the speed limit, you anticipate a yellow light ahead and begin your squeaking brakes. As the light turns, you are a quarter mile from the stop line, and of the two cars ahead of you the car directly in front of you, a new silver Mercedes-Ferrari Electric Hybrid, has stopped about 500 feet away.
Your brakes engage, squeak as loud as you have ever heard, and for one reason or another you hit the $456,000 four door sedan that tops off at 155 MPH in 12 seconds. The bumper, replacement cost your annual salary, after installation, is broken. Don’t ask for details, it just needs $45,000 worth of work from a 15 MPH fender bender.
Out comes (A) either driver, Presidential Candidate (take the test again, and replace with either Major Political Party), and from the shotgun position (B) a Secret Service agent who will witness and back whatever Mr. A says, no matter how awful.
Two more facts: 1. They are self-insured, so they have no Insurance, if it is their fault; and 2. Mr. B pressed the emergency oil slick button as they drew to a halt at seven miles per hour—thus it is 100% their fault. Oil is everywhere, and the Intersection Camera clearly can show the before and after.
Which one of these two gentlemen would you then like to encounter in what, without the super tip-top-secret auto, (a) wouldn’t have been an accident, nor (b) be considered potentially your fault and liability?
That is a more accurate measure for where we are today.
Lest we should consider this the Junior High School election, remember that the Executive of the USA typically administers directly to a force of hundreds of thousands of people, lest the millions directly commanded. So, which group do you pick... go ahead take the thought exercise a third time, and remember to Vote!
Thursday, July 9, 2020
The Reform we have waited for... a simple recommendation: 64 Stars
Type | Area | State | Initials | Est. Capitol Area | New Star | New Government | ||||
New Combined Territory | ||||||||||
E WA & N ID | Lincoln | LN | Spokane | Yes | Yes | |||||
Expanded Territory | ||||||||||
SW PA; E VA; NW NC; NE TN; W KY | West Viginia | WV | same | No | No | |||||
Spits of Michigan, New York and Florida | ||||||||||
MI | becomes | Michigan | MI | same | No | No | ||||
Superior | SU | Cheboygan | Yes | Yes | ||||||
NY | becomes | New York | NY | same | No | No | ||||
Great York | GY | Buffalo | Yes | Yes | ||||||
Florida | becomes | Florida | FL | same | No | No | ||||
South Florida | SF | Miami | Yes | Yes | ||||||
California Triplet | ||||||||||
N CA | Jefferson | JF | Redding | Yes | Yes | |||||
CA | California | CA | Sacramento | No | No | |||||
S CA | Dorado | DO | Los Angeles | Yes | Yes | |||||
Texas Pentet | ||||||||||
NW TX | Plainland | PL | Amarillo | Yes | Yes | |||||
NE TX | Trinity | TY | Fort Worth | Yes | Yes | |||||
Central | Texas | TX | same | No | No | |||||
E TX | Gulfland | GL | Houston | Yes | Yes | |||||
S TX | El Norte | EN | San Antonio | Yes | Yes | |||||
Commonwealth | ||||||||||
Puerto Rico | Puerto Rico | PR | San Juan | Yes | Yes | |||||
District of Colombia | Colombia | CB | Washington | Yes | Yes | |||||
Guam & Northern Marianas | Marianas | MR | Barrigada | Yes | Yes | |||||